Generally between 10-15 fellows are selected per year.
Frequently Asked Questions
Yes, fellows are expected to attend all of the meetings. Each meeting is specifically designed to achieve certain goals. The meetings provide fellows with the opportunity to learn about current health and aging issues, gain in-depth knowledge on the policymaking process, and develop skills needed to influence policy. In addition, the meetings allow fellows to network with agency heads, congressional staff and other leaders and key players in the field of health and aging and policy, and with other fellows.
Mentoring constitutes an important component of the program and is provided through a range of sources:
- The Program Director and Associate Director serve as “meta-mentors” for both fellowship and overall career mentoring.
- Each fellow is paired with one or more National Advisory Board (NAB) members or other national experts who serve as the fellow’s primary policy mentors, assisting them in linking with appropriate colleagues and policymakers (both inside and outside of government), and building related networks. Mentors are selected based on the interests and needs of each fellow. Fellows typically have monthly calls or in-person meetings with their mentors.
- Each fellow has a site-based mentor at his/her placement.
- “Coaches” are identified to assist fellows in developing needed skills (e.g., communicating to policymakers and the media, negotiation skills, etc.).
The NPO provides transitional/post-fellowship mentoring to all alumni fellows. In addition, through involvement of alumni in ongoing fellowship activities, current and alumni fellows are part of a network of peer mentors.
The health policy projects may be national, state, local, or institution-based and will be designed to further the objectives of the fellows’ individualized learning objectives and plans. Content and duration of the brief placements will be determined on a case-by-case basis.
Because the program will include professionals from different disciplines and career stages (with different salary histories), stipends for residential fellows will range and be commensurate with each individual’s current salary (up to $100,000 annually, roughly approximate to the General Schedule Pay Scale (GS) for a board certified physician). In addition to a stipend, financial support will be provided for travel (for one trip for pre-fellowship arrangements and to fellowship-related meetings), relocation ($4,500), and health insurance (up to $400/month).
Non-residential fellows may receive up to $10,000 to cover approved project related expenses and travel costs. It is expected that applicants will secure institutional, in-kind support that will allow them to commit 20% of their time to their policy project. Non-residential applicants who are early in their career and cannot secure full institutional, in-kind support for their fellowship participation may apply for partial salary support from the Health and Aging Policy Fellows program, up to a maximum of $15,000. Travel to fellowship-related meetings will be reimbursed by the NPO.
Many of our residential fellows have had placements in Congress, both in the Senate and House of Representatives working either as legislative staff in the offices of individual members of Congress or as committee staff (e.g., Senate HELP Committee, Senate Finance Committee, House Rules Committee, etc.) on a wide portfolio of legislative issues related to health care reform, financing, prevention and wellness, and the integration of health care delivery systems, mental health, dental care, etc. Some of the fellows have been directly involved in the health care reform process, working with senior policy experts and advisors to members of Congress on all facets of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.
Also, many of our residential fellows have had placements in various executive branch agencies, including Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Surgeon General’s Office, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation (ASPE), Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), Department of Transportation (DoT), Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and Department of Agriculture working on issues as varied as implementation of health care reform, “food deserts” (access to healthy foods), implementation of the National Healthcare Quality Strategy, etc.
Some of the issues fellows might be working on at the various placement sites will directly relate to health while others relate to larger societal issues but all are connected to the challenges confronting an aging society.
Placements for non-residential fellows included including Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation (ASPE), as well as AHRQ , the Department of Transportation, and the Administration on Community Living as well as the Senate Special Committee on Aging, among others. Issues fellows might be working on include policies regarding ways to strengthen Medicare, improving advance care planning in dementia, and policies regarding medications in Medicare Part D as well as transportation issues for the elderly and disabled.
The NPO provides transitional and post-fellowship mentoring to all fellows. In addition, through involvement of alumni in ongoing fellowship activities, current and alumni fellows become part of a network of peer mentors, with alumni fellows serving as peer mentors to current fellows. This provides an opportunity for alumni fellows to remain engaged in the program and expand their networks. The alumni network is strengthened through various mechanisms, including a fellowship website, regular conference calls after the fellowship and possibility of attending the Annual Leadership Retreat.
Although the selection committee does not follow any set quotas for selecting fellows, the goal is that a mix of disciplines and of professionals with diverse career experiences and interests are represented in the final selection of fellows. The program also makes every effort to attract applicants from underrepresented groups. Selection is based on the applicant’s potential for leadership in health policy, professional qualifications and achievements, impact of the fellowship experience on the applicant’s career, and interpersonal and communication skills.
No. We want a mix of professionals with some clinical training and background, as well as professionals whose work directly pertains to clinical care, but they don’t need to currently be involved in providing clinical services.
No. The residential model provides fellows with a hands-on policy experience in settings that offer exposure to a wide range of policy issues. Each fellow in the residential track works with colleagues in his/her placement site to determine tasks and roles.
The Program does not have geographical restrictions or requirements. Residential fellows may find placements at the federal or state level. The majority of residential fellows find placements at the federal level – most commonly in Congress or in an executive branch agency and live in Washington, D.C. Residential fellows who would like to be placed with state agencies are not restricted to their own states, but the placements must provide a good fit with fellows’ interests.
No. The non-residential model is designed for fellows to work on a policy project and participate in the meetings of the Core Program Components while staying at their current positions.
All fellows must attend the meetings described in FAQ #2. Time commitments to non-residential fellows’ policy projects are determined on an individual case-by-case basis, but applicants should plan to commit approximately 1 day per week to their policy fellowship.
Applicants should show that their home institution is engaged and committed to supporting the applicant’s participation in the program. In-kind support is viewed very broadly. Examples of in-kind support can include: freeing up time for the Fellow to work on the fellowship project and attend the fellowship meetings, providing access to formal leadership training programs, providing resources necessary for completion of the fellow’s project, etc.
Ideally, non-residential fellows will have a “home mentor” in addition to the various mentors the Health and Aging Policy Fellows Program will help to identify over the course of their fellowship (see also above “How are mentors identified?”). Having a home mentor will assist fellows with linking their fellowship work to policy resources at their home institution and with post-fellowship transitioning.
No, there are no restrictions on applicants reapplying to the program if not successful previously.
